MCMC issues public consultation paper on proposed amendments to Communications and Multimedia Act 1998
18 June 2026
On 10 June 2026, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (“MCMC”) issued a public consultation paper on the proposed amendments to the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (“CMA”) (“Paper”). Relevant stakeholders and members of the public are invited to submit written feedback on any aspect of the Paper by 10 July 2026.
The proposed amendments set out in the Paper are categorised into three groups:
- Strategic and substantive reforms to strengthen existing communications and multimedia framework, ensuring its relevance and effectiveness in light of evolving industry needs;
- Revisions to the regulatory costs, establishing statutory bases for fee imposition across various regulatory functions; and
- Amendments to the enforcement and regulatory powers, equipping the MCMC with stronger investigative tools and clarifying regulatory integrity.
This article summarises the proposed amendments set out in the Paper.
Background
The CMA is the primary legislation governing the communications and multimedia industry in Malaysia. Introduced in the late 1990s, the CMA has served as the foundational regulatory framework for the sector. However, there has been a significant shift in industry expectations and technological developments since its enactment.
These changes have rendered certain provisions of the CMA less suited to their intended purpose, necessitating updates to align with the evolving communications and multimedia landscape in Malaysia. The proposed amendments are aimed at addressing these gaps, ensuring the regulatory framework remains forward-looking and capable of supporting national policy objectives.
Summary of proposed amendments
The table below summarises the proposed amendments in the Paper, grouped by category along with the MCMC’s consultation questions.
|
Subject matter |
Proposed amendments |
MCMC’s question requiring feedback |
|
Strategic and substantive reforms |
||
|
Management of electronic addressing |
To establish statutory authority for the management and administration of electronic addressing (including internet protocol (IP) addresses, autonomous systems (AS) and associated fees), supporting the development of a National Internet Registry model. |
Whether establishing statutory authority for the MCMC to manage electronic addressing resources would support development of the communications and multimedia industry. |
|
Deeming mechanism under class licensing |
· To clarify the Communications Minister’s power to dispense with formalities of registration. · To provide that a deemed licensee’s registration can only be cancelled by way of a ministerial declaration issued under section 48 of the CMA. · To require deemed licensees to be subject to applicable fees, penalties and obligations comparable to voluntary registrants. |
Whether enhancements to the deeming mechanism are proportionate and operationally feasible. |
|
Undertakings framework |
· To expressly empower the MCMC to vary or revoke a registered undertaking when justified by surrounding circumstances, whether initiated by the MCMC or a licensee. · To harmonise the MCMC’s timelines to register or refuse to register an undertaking. |
Whether empowering the MCMC to vary or revoke undertakings and harmonising timelines would provide sufficient certainty for affected parties. |
|
Judicial review of Appeal Tribunal decisions |
To introduce an express right for aggrieved parties (including the MCMC) to seek judicial review in relation to the Appeal Tribunal’s decisions in the High Court. |
Whether enhancing judicial review rights in respect of the Appeal Tribunal’s decisions to all aggrieved parties is reasonable, and whether there are any procedural or practical considerations. |
|
Alignment of competition practices |
To update Part VI, Chapter 2 (General Competition Practices) of the CMA to align with the Competition Act 2010 (“CA”) and Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia Act 2017 (“CAAMA”) for consistent competition law framework in Malaysia. |
Views on updating general competition practices in the CMA to align with the CA and CAAMA. |
|
Enforceability of access agreements |
· To provide that only lodged access agreements are enforceable. · To establish a dispute resolution framework for lodged agreements. |
Views on enforceability of lodged and unlodged access agreements. |
|
Apparatus assignments |
· To extend the scope of apparatus assignment to cover both network infrastructure and customer equipment, replacing the term “network facility” with “apparatus” for consistency. · To clarify that the maximum term of five years for apparatus assignments is to be calculated from the dates stated in the assignment. |
Whether strengthening apparatus assignment provisions is technically and operationally feasible. |
|
Satellite network filings |
To establish a statutory framework for the MCMC’s administration of satellite network filings, including submitting and coordinating filings with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). |
Whether formalising the MCMC's authority to administer satellite network filings would strengthen Malaysia's satellite industry. |
|
Spectrum reassignment |
To enable the MCMC to undertake preparatory actions for spectrum reassignment before the current assignment expires. |
Whether formalising preparatory actions would improve operational efficiency of spectrum reassignment. |
|
Network facilities installation permits |
To enhance the existing framework by addressing operational challenges, strengthening the MCMC’s information gathering powers, improving management of fees and permit conditions, and improving national security oversight. |
Views on the proposed amendments to network facilities installation permits framework, including any recommendations to improve the installation, deployment, and management of network facilities in Malaysia. |
|
Right of private action |
To introduce a statutory right of private action for affected persons through civil proceedings, which will be available regardless of whether the contravening party has been charged or convicted under the CMA. |
Would this provide a useful avenue for affected persons seeking remedies. |
|
Regulatory costs |
||
|
Class licence fees |
To revise the types of fees prescribed for class licensees to reflect regulatory costs and activities associated with different categories of licensed service providers. |
Whether the proposed amendments for the imposition of fees would support the efficient and sustainable administration of regulatory functions under the CMA. |
|
Dispute resolution fees |
To establish the statutory power for the MCMC to impose fees for dispute resolution proceedings under the CMA. |
As above. |
|
Exemption application and merger notification fees |
To establish the statutory power for the MCMC to impose fees for processing exemption applications and merger notifications. |
As above. |
|
Technical standards fees |
To establish the statutory power for the MCMC to impose fees for conducting technical assessments and related administrative processes. |
As above. |
|
Enforcement and regulatory powers |
||
|
Equipment certification |
To clarify the distinction between certifying agencies’ technical assessment function and the MCMC's regulatory approval function. |
Whether the proposed amendment would provide greater clarity on the respective roles of the MCMC and the certifying agencies in equipment certification. |
|
Evidentiary requirements for non-standard equipment |
· To streamline evidentiary requirements under section 239 of the CMA to be technology neutral. · To allow reports and certificates from registered certifying agencies and bodies as prima facie evidence of non-standard equipment. |
Whether the proposed amendments would support more effective and efficient investigations and enforcement actions while maintaining appropriate safeguards. |
|
MCMC’s investigative powers |
To introduce express provisions for the use of agent provocateurs in enforcement operations and for the exercise of sampling powers for seized items under the CMA. |
As above. |
Conclusion and next steps
All relevant stakeholders are encouraged to review the proposed amendments in the Paper and provide feedback and comments, whether in hard copy or electronic form, to the MCMC by 5:00pm on Friday, 10 July 2026.
Companies operating in the communications and multimedia sector should assess the potential impact of these amendments on their operations, particularly in relation to licensing, competition compliance, access agreements, regulatory costs, and enforcement exposure.
Further information
This article has been prepared with the assistance of Senior Associate Ng Hong Syuen.